What Constitutes Schism?
Responding to that Covenant Union were those ministers and churches who denounced the sin of schism, plainly inferring that any who contemplated separation would be guilty of the sin of schism. It was that false charge which Machen proceeded in this article to refute, and refute very strongly.
Consider his words here. He wrote just eight months before his untimely death, “It is not schism to break away from an apostate church. It is a schism to remain in an apostate church, since to remain in an apostate church is to separate from the true church of Jesus Christ.” He then went on to explain that as of May 4, the Mandate of 1934 and 1935 had yet to be declared constitutional. It was simply an administrative pronouncement up to that time. If the General Assembly of 1936, to be held in several weeks, approved it, then it would be an action of the church. If that happened, as we know from the position of hindsight that it did, then all true believers had it as their duty to depart from the denomination because that church had placed the word of man above the Word of God and has dethroned Jesus Christ.
To read the full article by Dr. Machen, click here.
Words to Live By: God alone is Lord of the conscience and has left it free from any doctrines or commandments of men, (a) which are in any respect contrary to the Word of God,or (b) which, in regard to matters of faith and worship are not governed by the Word of God.
No comments
Comments feed for this article