THE SCHOOL & FAMILY CATECHIST
by Rev. William Smith (1834)
The Westminster Shorter Catechism
Q. 96. What is the Lord’s supper?
A. The Lord’s supper is a sacrament, wherein by giving and receiving bread and wine, according to Christ’s appointment, his death is shewed forth, and the worthy receivers are, not after a corporal and carnal manner, but by faith, made partakers of his body and blood, with all his benefits, to their spiritual nourishment and growth in grace.
EXPLICATION.
The Lord’s supper. –It is so called because it was appointed by Christ, immediately after eating the Passover, which was always at night.
Giving bread and wine. –This denotes God’s giving Christ, and Christ also giving himself to those who receive the Lord’s supper in a proper and worthy manner, as the bread represents Christ’s body, and the wine his blood.
Receiving bread and wine. –This signifies that the communicants, or those who partake of this holy ordinance, receive or accept of Christ with pleasure, as he is offered in the Gospel, and that they, by believing in him as the only Saviour, feed upon him, and all his benefits, to their spiritual nourishment.
His death is shewed forth. –That is, by this ordinance Christ’s death is held up to the view of the mind, and is thus kept in remembrance.
Worthy receivers. –Those who, being properly prepared, receive the Lord’s supper in a right manner.
Not after a corporal manner. –Not in a bodily sense. That is, the bread is not changed into the body of Christ; but is merely a symbol, or figurative representation of it.
Not in a carnal manner. –Not in a fleshy sense. This is intended to show, that as the bread is not transformed into the real body of Christ, nor the wine changed into his blood, so it is not in this gross and bodily sense, but by faith, or believing on him, that any one can feed upon him.
Made partakers of his body and blood. –Become united to Christ, and allowed to share in the blessings procured for his people by his death.
Spiritual nourishment and growth in grace. –The soul’s increasing or improving in holiness. This is known by the believer’s feelings more enlarged desires after “the sincere milk of the word,” more inward opposition to every sin, a greater tenderness of conscience, and more anxiety to fulfil faithfully all the duties of his station in life.
ANALYSIS.
The information here received respecting the Lord’s supper, may be divided into five particulars:
1. We are first told, that the Lord’s supper is a sacrament, in which the outward signs are bread and wine. –Luke xxii. 19, 20. He (Christ) took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: –likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the New Testament in my blood, which is shed for you.
2. That in this sacrament there is both a giving and a receiving of these signs. –See the proof of the last particular.
3. That by thus giving and receiving bread and wine, according to Christ’s appointment, his death is shewed forth. –1 Cor. xi. 26. For as often as ye eat this bread and drink this cup, ye do shew forth the Lord’s death till he come.
4. That the worthy receivers of the Lord’s supper are, not after a corporal and carnal manner, but by faith, made partakers of Christ’s body and blood. –1 Cor. x. 16. The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ?
5. That all Christ’s benefits are thus received by them to their spiritual nourishment and growth in grace. –John vi. 54, 55. Whoso eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life, –for my flesh is meat indeed and my blood is drink indeed. 1 Cor. xii. 13. We have been all made to drink into one Spirit.
You are currently browsing Wayne Sparkman’s articles.
The Man Who Looked Back
by Rev. David T. Myers
I was frozen in place that day behind the front desk of the Christian conference center in New Jersey. The distinguished man had walked up to me to ask whether the Director of the Conference was on site. I replied that he was away at the time. Whereupon the man gave me his business card, and walked out of the hotel that summer afternoon in 1965. Looking down, I read the name of “Edwin Rian, Assistant to the President, Princeton Theological Seminary, Princeton, New Jersey.” I wish that I could say to our readers that this young seminarian had then rushed out of the hotel to ask the writer of the historic book The Presbyterian Conflict to stop and talk. I wish that I could say to our readers that I stopped him and discussed with him as to why he left the infant Orthodox Presbyterian Church after such a valiant stand against the apostasy of the Presbyterian Church, USA. I could have asked him whether he remembered my father, who stood with him in the nineteen thirties for the faith, by faith. But I did none of these things. I was frozen in time.
Born in Minneapolis, Minnesota, Edwin Rian came to Princeton Theological Seminary to study Semitics at the prestigious school., as part of the Seminary’s class of 1927. Ordained in 1930 in the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America, he advanced his scholarship by studying as a Princeton Fellow at the Universities of Berlin and Marburg in Germany. Returning to the States, he saw clearly the issues which led his mentor J. Gresham Machen to organize Westminster Theological Seminary. He took his stand on those same issues, and like Machen and a number of other ministers, was censured by the Presbyterian Church, U.S.A. As a founding member of the Presbyterian Church of America (1936), he stayed with that church when the Bible Presbyterians left it in 1938. The former was later renamed the Orthodox Presbyterian Church. (1938). It was in 1940 that Rian crystallized the issues by writing the important book, “The Presbyterian Conflict.” It still can be found in print or online, and is quoted often by those who seek to understand this period in American Presbyterian history.
Something happened to Edwin Rian himself, though, in the latter part of the 1940’s. The fact that he left in 1946 to join the Christian University Association as its General Secretary was not unusual. What was unusual was that on April 25, 1947, he left the Orthodox Presbyterian Church to reenter the Presbyterian Church, U.S.A., from which he had been suspended over ten years before.
Various reasons had been suggested for this, sea change. One theory was that Rian was disappointed that a Christian University had not been started in Reformed circles. And certainly, the rest of his life and ministry was taken up in educational circles. But that reason doesn’t ring true to this contributor. The reasons, however, were never revealed.
He went on to serve in a variety of administrative posts in colleges and universities like Trinity University in San Antonio, Texas, Beaver College in Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, Jamestown College in Jamestown, North Dakota, Biblical Seminary in New York City, New York, and the American Bible Society in New York City. His last ministry and one in which he came full circle, was the position of Assistant to the President of Princeton Theological Seminary, Dr. James I. McCord, where he served for 15 years until his retirement. He departed this life in 1995 at age 95 in San Diego, California.
Words to Live By: Jesus said in Luke’s Gospel, chapter 6:62, “No one who puts his hand to the plow and looks back is fit for the kingdom of God.” The commentator writes that there are some whose hearts are in the past. They walk forever looking backwards and thinking wistfully of the good old days. The watchword of the Kingdom servants is always “forward,” never “backward.” Let us be not be content with lukewarm service.
by Rev. David T. Myers
I was frozen in place that day behind the front desk of the Christian conference center in New Jersey. The distinguished man had walked up to me to ask whether the Director of the Conference was on site. I replied that he was away at the time. Whereupon the man gave me his business card, and walked out of the hotel that summer afternoon in 1965. Looking down, I read the name of “Edwin Rian, Assistant to the President, Princeton Theological Seminary, Princeton, New Jersey.” I wish that I could say to our readers that this young seminarian had then rushed out of the hotel to ask the writer of the historic book The Presbyterian Conflict to stop and talk. I wish that I could say to our readers that I stopped him and discussed with him as to why he left the infant Orthodox Presbyterian Church after such a valiant stand against the apostasy of the Presbyterian Church, USA. I could have asked him whether he remembered my father, who stood with him in the nineteen thirties for the faith, by faith. But I did none of these things. I was frozen in time.
Born in Minneapolis, Minnesota, Edwin Rian came to Princeton Theological Seminary to study Semitics at the prestigious school., as part of the Seminary’s class of 1927. Ordained in 1930 in the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America, he advanced his scholarship by studying as a Princeton Fellow at the Universities of Berlin and Marburg in Germany. Returning to the States, he saw clearly the issues which led his mentor J. Gresham Machen to organize Westminster Theological Seminary. He took his stand on those same issues, and like Machen and a number of other ministers, was censured by the Presbyterian Church, U.S.A. As a founding member of the Presbyterian Church of America (1936), he stayed with that church when the Bible Presbyterians left it in 1938. The former was later renamed the Orthodox Presbyterian Church. (1938). It was in 1940 that Rian crystallized the issues by writing the important book, “The Presbyterian Conflict.” It still can be found in print or online, and is quoted often by those who seek to understand this period in American Presbyterian history.
Something happened to Edwin Rian himself, though, in the latter part of the 1940’s. The fact that he left in 1946 to join the Christian University Association as its General Secretary was not unusual. What was unusual was that on April 25, 1947, he left the Orthodox Presbyterian Church to reenter the Presbyterian Church, U.S.A., from which he had been suspended over ten years before.
Various reasons had been suggested for this, sea change. One theory was that Rian was disappointed that a Christian University had not been started in Reformed circles. And certainly, the rest of his life and ministry was taken up in educational circles. But that reason doesn’t ring true to this contributor. The reasons, however, were never revealed.
He went on to serve in a variety of administrative posts in colleges and universities like Trinity University in San Antonio, Texas, Beaver College in Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, Jamestown College in Jamestown, North Dakota, Biblical Seminary in New York City, New York, and the American Bible Society in New York City. His last ministry and one in which he came full circle, was the position of Assistant to the President of Princeton Theological Seminary, Dr. James I. McCord, where he served for 15 years until his retirement. He departed this life in 1995 at age 95 in San Diego, California.
Words to Live By: Jesus said in Luke’s Gospel, chapter 6:62, “No one who puts his hand to the plow and looks back is fit for the kingdom of God.” The commentator writes that there are some whose hearts are in the past. They walk forever looking backwards and thinking wistfully of the good old days. The watchword of the Kingdom servants is always “forward,” never “backward.” Let us be not be content with lukewarm service.
Joseph Addison Alexander was the third son of the Rev. Archibald Alexander and his wife Janetta (Waddel) Alexander. In modern terms, Joseph was home schooled, and he developed an insatiable thirst for knowledge, pursuing one subject after another as it caught his attention. Eventually he grew to become another of that esteemed early faculty of the Princeton Theological Seminary.
His biographer says of J.A. Alexander that
“…in the midst of all his laborious and diversified pursuits he saved time for the most heart-searching exercises in his closet. He gave himself up to daily communion with his God. He might neglect everything else, but he could not neglect his private devotions. In point of fact he neglected nothing. He moved as by clockwork. The cultivation of personal piety, in the light of the inspired word, was now with him the main object that he had in life. The next most prominent goal that he set before himself was the interpretation of the original scriptures; for their own sake, and for the benefit of a rising ministry, as well as for the gratification he took in the work. The Bible was to him the most profoundly interesting book in the world. It was in his eyes not merely the only source of true and undefiled religion, but also the very paragon among all remains of human genius. He knew great portions of it by heart….But more than this, the Bible was the chief object of his personal enthusiasm; he was fond of it; he was proud of it; he exulted in it. It occupied his best thoughts by day and by night. It was his meat and drink. It was his delectable reward. There were times when he might say with the Psalmist, “Mine eyes prevent the night watches that I might meditate in thy word, I have rejoiced in the way of thy precepts more than in great riches.” He succeeded perfectly in communicating this delightful zeal to others. His pupils all concur in saying that “he made the Bible glorious” to them.
Words to Live By: The Bible is the very Word of God—His self-revelation to His people. J.A. Alexander seems to have made Psalm 1 the model and guide for his life. If you have never memorized a portion of Scripture, this Psalm is short and is a great place to start. Setting it to memory, such that you can think on it at various times, will bring real profit.
1 Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful.
2 But his delight is in the law of the LORD; and in his law doth he meditate day and night.
3 And he shall be like a tree planted by the rivers of water, that bringeth forth his fruit in his season; his leaf also shall not wither; and whatsoever he doeth shall prosper.
4 The ungodly are not so: but are like the chaff which the wind driveth away.
5 Therefore the ungodly shall not stand in the judgment, nor sinners in the congregation of the righteous.
6 For the LORD knoweth the way of the righteous: but the way of the ungodly shall perish.
Additional Notes for this day:
Professor J.G. Machen, lecturer, author and Bible scholar, delivered two addresses on Christianity at the dedication of the new home of the New York Bible Society in East Forty-eighth Street. [The Continent 53.17 (27 April 1922): 529.]
An excerpt from Selected Works of John Calvin: Tracts and Letters, edited by Henry Beveridge and Jules Bonnet (Baker, 1983), vol. 7, p. 183.
“There exists but a small number of letters exchanged between Knox and Calvin. Those of the Scotch Reformer alluded to [earlier in this letter] in Calvin’s answer, have been lost and the letters of the Reformer of Geneva have not had a better fate. Dr. McCrie, the learned historian of Knox, affords no explanation of the loss of this precious correspondence, which leaves in history a void so much to be regretted.”
Geneva, 23d April 1561.
“. . . I come now to your letter, which was lately brought to me by a pious brother who has come here to pursue his studies. I rejoice exceedingly, as you may easily suppose, that the gospel has made such rapid and happy progress among you. That they should have stirred up violent opposition against you is nothing new. But the power of God is the more conspicuously displayed in this, that no attacks either of Satan or of the ungodly have hitherto prevented you from advancing with triumphant constancy in the right course, though you could never have been equal to the task of resistance, unless He who is superior to all the world had held out to you from heaven a helping hand. With regard to ceremonies, I trust, even should you displease many, that you will moderate your rigor. Of course it is your duty to see that the church be purged of all defilements which flow from error and superstition. For it behooves us to strive sedulously that the mysteries of God be not polluted by the admixture of ludicrous or disgusting rites. But with this exception, you are well aware that certain things should be tolerated even if you do not quite approve of them. I am deeply afflicted, as you may well believe, that the nobles of your nation are split into factions, and it is not without reason that you are more distressed and tormented, because Satan is now plotting in the bosom of your church, than you were formerly by the commotions stirred up by the French. But God is to be intreated that he may heal this evil also. Here we are exposed to many dangers. Nothing but our confidence in the divine protection exempts us from trepidation, though we are not free from fears.
Farewell, distinguished sir and honored brother. May the Lord always stand by you, govern, protect, and sustain you by his power. Your distress for the loss of your wife justly commands my deepest sympathy. Persons of her merit are not often to be met with. But as you have well learned from what source consolation for your sorrow is to be sought, I doubt not but you endure with patience this calamity. You will salute very courteously all your pious brethren. My colleagues also beg me to present to you their best respects.”
Words to Live By:
In my younger years in the ministry, this verse never failed to temper my agitated feelings against those who were my opponents in doctrine and life:
“And the Lord’s servant must not be quarrelsome but kind to everyone, able to teach, patiently enduring evil, correcting his opponents with gentleness, God may perhaps grant them repentance leading to a knowledge of the truth, and they may escape from the snare of the devil, after being captured by him to do his will.” — (2 Timothy 2:24-26, ESV)
It seems that some were proposing a plan for a smaller General Assembly for the PCUSA as recently as back in the 1930’s. I had not previously paid attention to such efforts in any of the old line Presbyterian denominations, but this was a surprise. Compare this with some of the various plans for a delegated Assembly that have been suggested for the PCA. In what follows, we read of how some thought a smaller general assembly might be accomplished in the PCUSA:
HOW TO DRAW A SMALLER ASSEMBLY
[The Presbyterian 107.13 (22 April 1937): 6.]
A General Assembly of approximately 470 commissioners can be composed so as to equalize the membership as between elders and ministers and to present adequately the communicant strength of the various areas of the Church on the following basis :
(1) One commissioner from each presbytery each year, alternating minister and elder (presbyteries to be listed according to Roll of Assembly, first, third, fifth, etc., to send minister first year, second, fourth, sixth, etc., to send elder), and then alternate.
(2) One additional pair of commissioners from each presbytery having 10,000 to 19,999 communicants; two elder-minister units (i.e., four commissioners) from presbyteries having 20,000 to 29,999 communicants; three, etc., from presbyteries having 30,000 to 39,999 communicants, and so on.
Checking this by the 1936 Minutes, it is found that we have a basic delegation of 279 commissioners (the number of presbyteries);
42 presbyteries in the 10,000 class, i.e., 84 additional commissioners;
9 presbyteries in the 20,000 class, i.e., 36 additional commissioners;
6 presbyteries in the 30,000 class, i.e., 36 additional commissioners;
no presbyteries in the 40,000 class;
2 presbyteries in the 50,000 class, i.e., 20 additional commissioners;
and one in the 60,000 class, i.e., 12 additional commissioners.
The additional commissioners total 188, which, with the basic group, make up 467 commissioners.
This is under 500 by 33 commissioners, but annual growth will soon begin to increase the delegations. This scheme is easy to figure, because the tabulation reveals the status of a presbytery by simply glancing at the digit in the 10,000 column. The elder-minister balance is maintained without elaborate explanation or computation.
Words to Live By:
As most of our readers probably now know, the PCA’s 48th General Assembly has been postponed due to the Coronavirus pandemic. It will instead meet in St. Louis in June of 2021. Let’s make opportunity of this turn of events and covenant to pray regularly for the PCA and for all the planning and preparation that will be required for the Assembly as it prepares to meet in St. Louis. May we be found faithful in our prayers and may we see the Lord’s leading and provision for the Church.